Peer-Reviewers

Pakungwati Law Review

Peer Reviewers

Scholars who contribute independent expertise to the quality, rigor, integrity, and development of research published in PLR.

Contribution of Peer Reviewers

Pakungwati Law Review (PLR) acknowledges the essential contribution of its peer reviewers. Through independent and constructive assessment, reviewers help the editors evaluate originality, methodological rigor, legal reasoning, engagement with scholarship, ethical compliance, and the significance of submitted manuscripts.

PLR applies a double-blind peer-review process. Reviewers are selected according to their expertise, scholarly experience, independence, and absence of conflicts of interest.

Editorial note for this draft

The Scopus and Sinta identifiers shown as “000000” are placeholders from the supplied document. Replace them with verified identifiers and add the correct Google Scholar profile links before publication.

Reviewers

Peer-Reviewer Name

Universitas of University, City, Indonesia

Scopus ID: 000000Sinta ID: 000000Google Scholar

Peer-Reviewer Name

University Affiliation, City, Indonesia

Scopus ID: 000000Sinta ID: 000000Google Scholar

Peer-Reviewer Name

University Affiliation, City, Indonesia

Scopus ID: 000000Sinta ID: 000000Google Scholar

Peer-Reviewer Name

University Affiliation, City, Indonesia

Scopus ID: 000000Sinta ID: 000000Google Scholar

Peer-Reviewer Name

University Affiliation, City, Indonesia

Scopus ID: 000000Sinta ID: 000000Google Scholar

Peer-Reviewer Name

University Affiliation, City, Indonesia

Scopus ID: 000000Sinta ID: 000000Google Scholar

Peer-Reviewer Name

University Affiliation, City, Indonesia

Scopus ID: 000000Sinta ID: 000000Google Scholar

Peer-Reviewer Name

University Affiliation, City, Indonesia

Scopus ID: 000000Sinta ID: 000000Google Scholar

Peer-Reviewer Name

University Affiliation, City, Indonesia

Scopus ID: 000000Sinta ID: 000000Google Scholar

Peer-Reviewer Name

University Affiliation, City, Indonesia

Scopus ID: 000000Sinta ID: 000000Google Scholar

Reviewer Independence

Reviewers must disclose any financial, institutional, collaborative, supervisory, personal, or intellectual conflict that could affect impartiality. A reviewer with a relevant conflict must decline or withdraw from the assignment.

Confidentiality

Submitted manuscripts, review reports, author responses, and editorial correspondence are confidential. Reviewers may not share, quote, retain, or use unpublished content outside the authorized peer-review process.

Acknowledgement

PLR extends its sincere appreciation to all reviewers for the time, expertise, and professional judgment they contribute to the journal. Their work supports fair editorial decisions and strengthens the quality of published legal scholarship.