|
SUBMISSION
Pakungwati Law Review
|
|
|
Submit Your Manuscript
Authors are invited to submit original and academically rigorous manuscripts through the PLR online submission system.
Please review the Author Guidelines before submitting your manuscript.
|
|
Publication Ethics
Pakungwati Law Review
Publication Ethics
Principles and responsibilities for maintaining integrity, fairness, transparency, and trust throughout scholarly publication.
Ethical Commitment
Pakungwati Law Review (PLR) is committed to safeguarding the integrity of the scholarly record and promoting responsible research and publication practices. This policy applies to authors, editors, editorial-board members, reviewers, and all parties involved in the publication process.
PLR handles submissions and allegations of misconduct fairly, confidentially, consistently, and without discrimination. Editorial decisions are based on academic merit, relevance, originality, methodological rigor, ethical compliance, and contribution to legal scholarship.
Integrity
Honest research and reporting
Honest research and reporting
Independence
Impartial editorial judgment
Impartial editorial judgment
Transparency
Clear disclosure and accountability
Clear disclosure and accountability
Fairness
Respectful and equitable treatment
Respectful and equitable treatment
1 Responsibilities of Editors
- Evaluate manuscripts fairly and exclusively on scholarly merit, without discrimination based on identity, affiliation, nationality, religion, gender, political view, or other irrelevant considerations.
- Protect the confidentiality of submitted manuscripts, reviewer identities, correspondence, and unpublished information.
- Select qualified and independent reviewers and take reasonable steps to prevent conflicts of interest and biased review.
- Recuse themselves from handling a manuscript when a personal, professional, institutional, intellectual, or financial conflict may affect impartiality.
- Ensure that editorial decisions are not influenced by advertising, sponsorship, publication fees, fast-track payments, institutional pressure, or commercial interests.
- Investigate credible ethical concerns and preserve the scholarly record through corrections, retractions, or other notices when necessary.
- Provide authors with reasoned decisions and maintain an appropriate mechanism for appeals and complaints.
2 Responsibilities of Reviewers
- Provide objective, evidence-based, constructive, respectful, and timely assessments.
- Decline an invitation when the manuscript lies outside their competence or when they cannot complete the review within the agreed period.
- Disclose conflicts of interest and withdraw whenever impartiality may reasonably be questioned.
- Treat the manuscript and all review materials as confidential and refrain from contacting the authors directly.
- Identify relevant uncited work and alert the editor to suspected plagiarism, duplicate publication, fabricated evidence, or other ethical concerns.
- Never use unpublished information, arguments, or data obtained through peer review for personal research, competitive advantage, or any other unauthorized purpose.
3 Responsibilities of Authors
- Submit original, accurate, and methodologically sound work that has not been published or simultaneously submitted elsewhere.
- Cite and acknowledge all sources appropriately, including ideas, words, data, images, tables, legal materials, and the authors' own related publications.
- Present data and evidence honestly; fabrication, falsification, selective manipulation, and misleading omission are prohibited.
- Retain relevant research records and provide supporting data or documentation when reasonably requested, subject to confidentiality, consent, and legal restrictions.
- Obtain necessary ethical approval, informed consent, institutional authorization, and permissions for copyrighted or confidential material.
- Disclose funding, institutional support, financial interests, personal relationships, and other potential conflicts of interest.
- List only genuine contributors as authors and acknowledge other forms of assistance appropriately.
- Notify the editor promptly upon discovering a significant error or ethical problem in a submitted or published article and cooperate in correcting the record.
Core Ethical Standards
The following requirements apply throughout submission, review, publication, and post-publication oversight.
Originality and Plagiarism
Unattributed copying, close paraphrasing, appropriation of ideas or data, and substantial text recycling are prohibited. Submissions may be screened with similarity-detection software.
Unattributed copying, close paraphrasing, appropriation of ideas or data, and substantial text recycling are prohibited. Submissions may be screened with similarity-detection software.
Exclusive Submission
A manuscript must not be under consideration by another journal. Duplicate, redundant, or fragmented publication without disclosure is unacceptable.
A manuscript must not be under consideration by another journal. Duplicate, redundant, or fragmented publication without disclosure is unacceptable.
Authorship and Contribution
Authorship requires substantial scholarly contribution, participation in drafting or revision, approval of the final version, and accountability for the work.
Authorship requires substantial scholarly contribution, participation in drafting or revision, approval of the final version, and accountability for the work.
Conflicts of Interest
Authors, reviewers, and editors must disclose relationships or interests that could influence, or reasonably appear to influence, their judgment.
Authors, reviewers, and editors must disclose relationships or interests that could influence, or reasonably appear to influence, their judgment.
Research Involving People
Research involving participants, interviews, sensitive data, or vulnerable groups must follow applicable ethical, legal, consent, privacy, and safeguarding requirements.
Research involving participants, interviews, sensitive data, or vulnerable groups must follow applicable ethical, legal, consent, privacy, and safeguarding requirements.
Data and Image Integrity
Data, quotations, translations, images, and visual materials must not be fabricated, falsified, deceptively altered, or presented without proper permission and attribution.
Data, quotations, translations, images, and visual materials must not be fabricated, falsified, deceptively altered, or presented without proper permission and attribution.
Generative AI and Automated Tools
- Generative-AI systems and automated tools cannot be listed as authors because they cannot assume responsibility, provide consent, disclose conflicts, or be accountable for published work.
- Authors remain fully responsible for the accuracy, originality, citations, confidentiality, legality, and integrity of all submitted content.
- Material use of generative AI in drafting, translation, analysis, coding, image production, or other research activities must be disclosed transparently in the manuscript, except for routine spelling or grammar assistance.
- Editors and reviewers must not upload confidential manuscripts or review materials to external AI systems that may retain, process, or expose the content.
Handling Allegations of Misconduct
1Receipt and preliminary assessment
The editor records the allegation, preserves relevant evidence, and determines whether the concern is specific, credible, and within the journal's responsibility.
The editor records the allegation, preserves relevant evidence, and determines whether the concern is specific, credible, and within the journal's responsibility.
2Confidential inquiry
The person concerned is given a fair opportunity to respond. Additional documents, expert advice, reviewer input, or institutional information may be sought.
The person concerned is given a fair opportunity to respond. Additional documents, expert advice, reviewer input, or institutional information may be sought.
3Independent evaluation
Editors with conflicts of interest take no part. The journal distinguishes honest error or scholarly disagreement from intentional or reckless misconduct.
Editors with conflicts of interest take no part. The journal distinguishes honest error or scholarly disagreement from intentional or reckless misconduct.
4Proportionate action
Possible actions include requesting clarification or correction, rejecting a submission, correcting or retracting an article, restricting future submissions, or notifying an institution or relevant authority when justified.
Possible actions include requesting clarification or correction, rejecting a submission, correcting or retracting an article, restricting future submissions, or notifying an institution or relevant authority when justified.
Post-Publication Notices
| Notice | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Correction | Corrects an error that affects accuracy or interpretation but does not invalidate the article's central findings. |
| Expression of Concern | Alerts readers to serious unresolved concerns while an investigation is incomplete, inconclusive, or delayed. |
| Retraction | Identifies findings or content that are unreliable, redundant, plagiarized, unethical, or otherwise seriously compromised. |
| Removal | Reserved for exceptional circumstances involving legal requirements, serious privacy or safety risks, or content that cannot responsibly remain available. |
Appeals
An author may appeal an editorial decision by identifying a material error, procedural irregularity, conflict of interest, or serious misunderstanding. The appeal must be evidence-based and submitted within [30 days]. Mere disagreement with academic judgment is insufficient.
Complaints
Complaints concerning editorial conduct, peer review, discrimination, confidentiality, fees, or publication procedures should be submitted to [ethics/editorial email]. Where practicable, the matter will be handled by a person not directly involved in the disputed decision.
Protection of the Scholarly Record
PLR will act whenever credible evidence indicates that the accuracy, provenance, legality, or ethical integrity of published content is materially compromised. Corrections and other notices will be clearly identified, linked to the original article, and preserved as part of the permanent publication record.
